Criticism of "On the Purpose of the Arts"

“On the Purpose of the Arts” by Cronin, the president of Whitman College, discusses the view of Whitman College on the importance and place of arts in society. He says that, “The critically important role of the arts in the academy, as in life, is to enable us to see the world and the human condition differently, and in seeing the world through a particular work of art, to see a truth we might not have understood before” (Cronin). He talks about this a lot and relates it back to how this can help broaden the view of the humanist, artist, scientist, and politician by introducing them to a different perspective. He also discusses how Whitman College offers a lot of programs for students to participate in the arts. Also it’s good to note that Whitman College is a liberal arts college.

It seems to me that the only people who value the arts are the ones who participate in the arts. The only ones pushing for arts in schools are artists in their various forms. Cronin makes a good case on why artists are important to our society: they make people think. Yes, think, what
a concept, in a world where information is handed out literally to you on a television, art is something that requires analysis and some time to interpret the meanings behind it. Which also applies to life, people are not open books, and if they are, they are often in a foreign language. Problems are not straightforward, most of the time, so they also require analysis and careful interpretation, whether you’re an engineer or an auto mechanic. So art does have its place. It stimulates the mind to think differently and enriches the artist and audience.

Cronin, Tom. "On the Importance of the Arts." Whitman College. Whitman College,
n.d. Web. 21 Apr 2010.
.

Criticism of "Exploder"

“Exploder” performed by Audioslave, literally, outlines the acquaintances of the narrator. In the first verse he meets a man who was in jail for a crime he didn’t commit. The second verse is about the daughter of a man who committed suicide, who ended up taking her own life and a boy who heard voices and might have killed his mother. In the final verses the narrator appears to have a mental break. He meets a man who looks a lot like himself, he fights this man in the street, then when he turned around the narrator shot the man, but when he looked in the mirror, he realized he’d shot himself and there was never another man. The chorus is about how if you’ve never experienced the dark side of life, then you can never truly appreciate the good in it or be prepared for the bad.
In the first verse, “the man locked away for things he hadn’t done” (lines 1-2), could be an extension of the narrator feeling trapped by others' opinions or drugs. The roses and smile could refer to the man’s death, being laid out in a coffin holding roses, which could be foreshadowing to the end of the song because he says “When he smiled at me/ I could understand,” (lines 5-7). The second verse about the girl says that she did what her father had done before her, which could refer to possibly a drug addiction, depression or a combination (line 15). The boy who heard voices is obviously schizophrenic and may have killed his mother because the voices told him to because he had no one to confide in (lines 16-18). The last verse tells about the narrator, he could have been on drugs or possibly deep into depression so that what he saw in the mirror was only similar to himself. He fought the drugs or the depression, but he “turned away” and shot the vice, a part of himself, however the narrator could have given up and killed himself (lines 24-29). The chorus relates all of these back together, the first line goes with the first verse, and the second line goes with the schizophrenic boy. “If you’re right you’ll never fear the wrong,” (line 10) goes back to if you’re always right or do the right thing you do not understand the consequences of a bad decision, so you cannot understand the fear of what happens if you slip and “fall off the wagon”, as it were. “If your head is high you’ll never fear at all,” (line 11) means that if you have always kept to the straight and narrow or had a mental illness, you cannot really relate to the person who does have one. This relates to my topic because it conveys the narrow-mindedness and the shortsightedness of the public.

"Audioslave Exploder." youtube. Web. 14 Apr 2010. .
Cornell, Chris. "Exploder." Slave to the Audioslave. tripod, n.d. Web. 14 Apr 2010. .

Criticism of The Schaeffer Eye Center Crawfish Boil

The Crawfish Boil is an annual two day event held normally on the first weekend in May. It’s in a field/parking lot outside of the BJCC in downtown Birmingham. The line-up this year was Fuel, Theory of a Deadman, Seether, Akon, and Alice in Chains on Friday. On Saturday the line-up was Rocket Summer, Jason Derulo, Jay Sean, the B-52s, Train, and the Goo Goo Dolls.
The first day we were in the VIP section and the view was great, much better in years past, being a very short person, it’s worth the extra money to get into the VIP, however, on Saturday I was in the general admission and I will say it was set up pretty well besides the people in the lawn chairs making a barrier behind the crowd. Anyway, all the bands that I saw were awesome; I saw all of Friday and came in the middle of the B-52s. The crowds were very impressive and really got into the music, I’ve been going for the past three years and I’ve never seen the crowd that big before. The only real complaint I have is that Seether should’ve played later instead of the same twilight show for the performance they consistently give. They were the only band that day to be called for an encore besides the headliner, Alice in Chains. During Seether it felt like the crowd just came together and was just enjoying the company of all the people who’d come to hear the same music they loved. I also have to say the DJ, Goofy White Kid, did a great job picking songs between bands, on another note, and can we get him for prom? But while I was there, I got to thinking, these guys had to start somewhere, at one point in time they all sucked because they were just learning to play or had just formed together. They had to work extremely hard to get to this point; Seether for example is a band from South Africa. I’m not saying that we can all be Alice in Chains some day, I’m saying that music is a lot of hard work and without support, no one would be a musician or an artist of any kind. It was one of the best music festivals I’ve ever been to, because I could really become a part of it. In the words of most of the bands, “Good night, Birmingham!”

Criticism of The Challenge of Art to Psychology

Seymour Sarason

The Challenge of Art to Psychology by Seymour Sarason argues the universal nature of artistic activity in humans. He notes how every child in every culture draws or paints, but as they get older only a select few still participate in artistic activity. He argues that everyone is creative and has a desire to express themselves through artistic activity and can feel a void in their lives without it. He cites a few experiments, one with ghetto elementary school children being taught poetry, a nursing home introduced to poetry, and menta

lly ill and handicapped individuals being taught visual art. They all showed a measure of proficiency, they were not so called great artists, but they could bring an image in their minds to their medium of choice. He also gives a few explanations why people stop participating in artistic activity. He also says that some professions are artistic activity, but they are not recognized as art because of society’s definition of art, such as a landscaper and a book translator.

I thought that the book was very interesting. It really gives some insight into why so many people don’t participate in the fine arts or anything creative. They think that they are uncreative because they couldn’t play like Beethoven or draw like Rembrandt. So society says they are not creative. But in the study done by Schaefer-Simmern at a mental institution with mentally handicapped people, it really shows that everyone is creative (Sarason 30-65). “They could all participate on some level at their own developmental stage” (Sarason 34). That’s what really convinced me that people were very underestimated if you look at some of the drawings and quilting these individuals did.

I also have to say, regarding professions, I had never considered translators as creative people, although a well translated work means the difference between a great book and a horrible nightmare. If you really think about it the man who restores old cars is also an artist, he puts something of himself to the automobile. Gardeners could also be considered artists, they arrange the flowers and grow them, tend to them until they finally bloom and that person also put an image from their mind into the outside world. It really did make me think about things in a different light and how society needs to redefine its definition of art. These people seem to be more fulfilled according to Sarason and I believe him, if you participate in something that leaves your mark on the world, you’re going to be more fulfilled, even if you aren’t a “great artist”.

Sarason, Seymour. The Challenge of Art to Psychology. 1st. New Haven, London: Yale University, 1990. Print.

Criticism of “Grants Nurture Arts Spaces and Housing”

president of Ford Foundation (picture)

“Grants Nurture Arts Spaces and Housing” by Stephanie Strom discusses the new grant supported by the Ford Foundation. They are going to commit around $100 million to the building, renovating, and/or expanding art spaces across the nation. Strom states, “This notion of the economic benefits of the arts has become increasingly popular lately among arts financers and administrators, who are keenly aware that in times of economic paucity spending on the arts is sometimes seen as frivolous,”(Strom). But the president of Ford, Mr. Ubiñas, has seen that whole communities can build around the arts and revitalize deserted urban districts. So he committed this money to fund the arts and help struggling artists.

I think that this is a great thing that Ford is doing for artists and the community. It proves that not everyone in America thinks that the arts are just a frill. It will give artists a place to live, work, and hopefully make money through their work. Although it may just be about making money and not really about valuing arts and artists, at least it’s a step in favor of it.

Strom, Stephanie. "Grants Nurture Arts Spaces and Housing." New York Times (2010): n. pag. Web. 13 Apr 2010.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/05/arts/design/05ford.html?ref=design

Criticism of “Book Tackles Old Debate: Role of Art in Schools”

“Book Tackles Old Debate: Role of Art in Schools” by Robin Pogrebin discusses a new a book by Ms. Winners and Ms. Hetland. Back in 2000 they published research that said that arts programs in schools did not benefit students’ overall performance in the classroom or on tests (Pogrebin). In their new book they defend their stance, but say that: “art education should be championed for its own sake, not because of a wishful sentiment that classes in painting, dance and music improve pupils’ math and reading skills and standardized test scores,” (Pogrebin). They outline that there are benefits to art programs in schools, but they were indirect, like drama lead to some improvement of speaking skills.

I felt that this article was interesting, but the information was not new. If most arts programs did not support themselves in public schools they would not be there. Just because a student plays an instrument does not make him or her good at math, despite the math involved with playing music. However, it shows America’s value of art and artistic activity; people are only willing to fund the programs if it can improve intelligence and tests scores, not for the sake of art. It is an excellent example of American attitude.

Pogrebin, Robin. "Book Tackles Old Debate: Role of Art in Schools." New York Times (2007): n. pag. Web. 8 Apr 2010.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/04/arts/design/04stud.html